HONG KONG
Evidence, trials, talent
- Interviews, scene cards, paper reproduction and courses;
- Tech 300 / HKSTP / TSSSU / ESS / PSTS work packages;
- Controlled public-sector trial language;
- IP applicants and research-substance records.
HONG KONG EVIDENCE × SHENZHEN ENGINEERING
Hong Kong forms research evidence, trials and academic interfaces. Shenzhen completes mechanical prototypes, supply chain, small-batch work and Greater Bay Area delivery. People, cost, IP and results on both sides must be separable.
If “Hong Kong research, Shenzhen engineering” exists only on a poster, reviewers read two empty shells. The operating model answers: who works where, where the hardware sits, where contracts and invoices live, who files IP, and which side hosts a trial.
The product fits that split. Collision-tolerant mechanics, rigs and DFM need Pearl River Delta supply speed. Localisation, data governance, public-sector trials and university interfaces fit Hong Kong’s science-park and ITF toolbox. Qianhai matching, where used, assumes a Hong Kong award first. It amplifies; it does not replace.
A field application exists. That confirmation is not an award announcement, not a dual-entity registration claim, and not a stacked-subsidy promise.
HONG KONG
SHENZHEN
SPLIT RULES
The same hour cannot count as Hong Kong R&D and Shenzhen matching. The same prototype invoice cannot enter two projects.
A Hong Kong company would hold research contracts and trials; a Shenzhen entity would hold engineering execution. Equity, directors and related-party trades stay on separate ledgers. Entity names are unpublished here until filings exist.
Talent schemes such as RTH-TC exclude founder-shareholders. Cross-city staff must record workplace and task ownership.
Background IP, university/employer rights and employee inventions are clarified before filing. Public “joint R&D” needs written authorisation.
Storage location, de-identification and site-owner control go on the mission card. Atlas reserves codes for both sides.